Zitat von Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 04:32:35PM +0200, Andre Pönitz wrote:
Just keeping it in does not come for free, and there's no technical
reason not to use Qt4. Qt4 is more widely available than and almost
uniformly
better across the whole range.
Except on Solaris. Using Qt 4.1.4 I don't obtain antialiased fonts
and the icons have an ugly aspect, too. It's even worse than xforms
with scaled bitmaps.
I don't know why it is so. In Qt3, the xft library was used, but this
is no longer the case with Qt4, which probably relies on fontconfig,
which, in turn, is not up to date on Solaris (my speculation).
I have not checked the appearance of icons on solaris, but Qt4 as
such certainly compiles and works there.
The net result is that Qt4 on Solaris is *much* worse than Qt3.
What does TT say?
Andre'
