Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Am Samstag, 21. Oktober 2006 17:09 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
| > In this code:
| >
| > case 0xac: // ¬ NOT SIGN
| > case 0xb5: // µ MICRO SIGN
| > if ((bparams.inputenc == "latin1" ||
| > bparams.inputenc == "latin9") ||
| > (bparams.inputenc == "auto" &&
| > (font.language()->encoding()->latexName()
| > == "latin1" ||
| > font.language()->encoding()->latexName()
| > == "latin9"))) {
| > os << "\\ensuremath{";
| > os.put(c);
| > os << '}';
| > column += 13;
| > } else {
| > os.put(c);
| > }
| >
| > shouldn't we just do os.put(c) all the time. We don't care about input
| > encoding and we only output utf8.
|
| I care about input encoding. Of course you can always do os.put(c) and
| ignore the limitations of LaTeX, but I see no reason to do so.
We do it in all other places, we should here as well.
--
Lgb
