On Tuesday 24 October 2006 8:58 pm, Bo Peng wrote: > > please not that in this case it is not necessary to run > > autogen.sh or configure. That is only needed for bigger changes > > (deleting/adding a directory etc.) > > My understanding is every addition/removal of files leads to > autogen.sh. They are frankly not rare events. > > > No, Lars has some not merged branches. I wo't oppose such a change, but I > > won't do it either. > > Then we wil never be able to do it since everyone has his unmerged > branches. It is the best time I have seen in months because all big > changes are in trunk.
I propose to leave this for 1.6, I don't expect so many new files in 1.5 so the advantages would not be so many. On the other hand after 1.5 and the xml merging this would be the right time. > Other votes? (I should have proposed this to Denmark people, since > they can vote easily, or act without votes.) Since I am one the Denmark people does that makes me Danish? ;-) > Bo -- José Abílio
