Peter Kümmel wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
no-undefined symbols work well with C++. However I don't
see what you'd link to make this usable.
We have (1) core + frontend (without Qt)
(2) frontend + frontend/qt (without core)
But linking-wise both depend on the 'without' stuff
With some effort (1) should not depend on Qt and that's the way to go IMHO:
- static lib libLyX.[a/lib]:
contains core (src/inset/support/etc) + frontend + controller
It's not hard do create a shared support library, it's the most simple
part, I already had it in my dll branch.
Agreed. Then the "non shared" between the exe and the qt4 frontend dll
part would be even smaller.
Abdel.
