José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thursday 26 October 2006 3:32 pm, Bo Peng wrote:
> > > Regarding the .C issue, although I don't like them, I think that we
> > > should postpone this to 1.6.
> >
> > I respect your decision, but please be more specific. Will this happen
> > immediately after 1.5.x is released so that 1.5.x and 1.6/trunk have
> > the same file extension? (Or you mean 1.6.x and 1.7?)
>
> My proposal is to do it as soon as the xml patch goes in. At the same time
> we should rename the files according to their contents and be consistent in
> the naming.
If one of you takes the time to write a script to automate the procedure
* file.C -> file.cpp
* fix all references in build files and documentation
* register the rename in SVN.
* whatever other stuff it needs to do.
then the whole argument is redundant.
Just make the change, hand the tool out so that people can run it on their own
branches and stop arguing about trivialities ;-)
Angus
