>>>>> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Andre> On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 10:42:36AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote:
>> One year for the 1.5 cycle would not be a scandal, and that puts us
>> in march 2007. I am not saying that we shall do that, but there is
>> no need to try to get a xmas date (as was proposed elsewhere) if we
>> feel we cannot do it.

Andre> You know that that Christmas release data is kind of a running
Andre> gag...

Yes I do :)

JMarc

Reply via email to