On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 04:14:56PM +0200, Michael Gerz wrote: > Andre Poenitz wrote: > > >Using operator==() in that case is misleading as we suddenly have > >situations with a == b, b == c, and a != c. > > > >For fuzzy comparison, a named function should be used. > > > > > Agreed. I wasn't very happy with it, too. > > I will fix it in the next commit.
But for adjacency this objection doesn't hold, does it? - Martin
pgpxlJsj3p7lM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
