On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 08:03:56PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 07:49:46PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > > > Am Montag, 30. Oktober 2006 19:17 schrieb Enrico Forestieri: > > > The attached patch fixes the \sinx problem. > > > > Good that you found it. > > > > > Any objections to applying it? > > > > Yes. isAlpha() should be implemented as an ucs4 function, and if a hack is > > needed it should be done inside this function. > > An hack? What do you mean? > > > Then I would also like to know why this problem was introduced. Probably > > not by removing the code you just added (or was it done by accident?). > > Probably by adding the overloaded << operator and not taking the appropriate > actions. Last week it was really difficult to follow all changes... > > > Are > > you sure that you do not trigger another problem that was to be solved by > > the patch that created the \sinx problem? > > No, I am not sure of anything, but I can't see what problem could be > introduced. The \sinx problem was introduced by overlooking, IMO.
No, probably when converting the math parser to unicode. Andre'
