On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 02:33:20PM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 08:37:14PM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> >> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 01:08:56AM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> >>>> Here a totally superfluously patch:
> >>> Erm.
> >>>
> >>>> +void Splash::finish(int secs)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> + if (qsp == 0)
> >>>> + return;
> >>>> + QTime t = QTime::currentTime().addSecs(secs);
> >>>> + while (t > QTime::currentTime())
> >>>> + {
> >>>> + }
> >>>> + delete qsp;
> >>>> +}
> >>> A busy loop?
> >> Who cares?
> >
> > I do.
> >
> > Especially since QSplashScreen gives you all you need to setup a decent
> > splshscreen - provided that's something that's really needed.
> >
> >>> Are you aware of QSplashScreen?
> >> Have a look at the patch again.
> >
> > Why do you need to wrap it then.
>
> Because I wanna start it in non-frontend code.
Don't we call a frontend specific init function pretty early anyway?
Why not start the frontend-specific splash from there?
Andre'