Bennett Helm wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2006, at 3:22 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote:
>
>> Does it also work when you remove the patch before the last one?
>
> Crash this time. Here's the backtrace:
OK, I've checked in both patches.
But it's not a perfect solution, I've also added
this comment:
Index: lyx_main.C
===================================================================
--- lyx_main.C (Revision 16108)
+++ lyx_main.C (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -396,9 +396,14 @@
support::os::internal_path(package().temp_dir() +
"/lyxsocket")));
exit_status = pimpl_->application_->exec();
+
+ // FIXME: Do we still need this reset?
+ // I assume it is the reason for strange Mac crashs
+ // Test by reverting rev 16110 (Peter)
// Kill the application object before exiting. This avoid crash
// on exit on Linux.
pimpl_->application_.reset();
+
>
> LyX::quit() called: 1
> LyX::quit() 1
> LyX::quit() 2
> LyX::quit() 3
> LyX::quit() 4
> LyX::quit() 5
>
> Program received signal EXC_BAD_ACCESS, Could not access memory.
> Reason: KERN_PROTECTION_FAILURE at address: 0x00000040
> 0x00091b65 in lyx::LyXServerSocket::~LyXServerSocket (this=0x1a31a900)
> at lyxsocket.C:82
> 82 theApp->unregisterSocketCallback(fd_);
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x00091b65 in lyx::LyXServerSocket::~LyXServerSocket
> (this=0x1a31a900) at lyxsocket.C:82
> #1 0x0066c47a in boost::checked_delete<lyx::LyXServerSocket>
> (x=0x1a31a900) at ../boost/boost/checked_delete.hpp:34
> #2 0x000691ed in lyx::LyX::quit (this=0xbffff954) at lyx_main.C:467
> #3 0x000692fe in lyx::LyX::~LyX (this=0xbffff954) at lyx_main.C:179
> #4 0x00002e95 in main (argc=1, argv=0xbffff9e4) at main.C:48
>
> Bennett
>
>
--
Peter Kümmel
