Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Juergen> Jean-Marc, would this be o.k. for 1.4? > > Yes, except that it is a bit weird to add the setCursor just for the > depm part (and not really to set the cursor).
Indeed, but it does not only care for dEPM, but also if the cursor is valid. I wonder, though, if the explicit set of bvcursor is not redundand now. > But I guess it is not worse than other parts of the code, so go ahead. Well, not really an encouraging judgement ;-) Jürgen
