On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 03:09:55PM +1800, Bo Peng wrote: > >> Although your qt installation has to be blamed. I have modified > >> SConstruct to accommendate this. > > > >Why should my qt installation be blamed? > > Ok. Maybe it is perfectly ok for a distribution to provide only > release libraries for a package like qt-devel.
Of course it is. qt-devel is Qt _for_ development, i.e. headers and docs as opposd to plain qt which is only libraries needed for running applications. > (Then what if people need to debug qt?) They use Qt from source. Andre'
