Angus Leeming wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
The scanning of the bibtex files should be independent of the loaded
Buffer. Imagine you have two Buffers using the same bibtex file, the
same scanning will need to be done twice for no reason. Or maybe I am
missing something?
Technically, you do miss something. Different Buffers could load the same
Bibtex file with different options. One might use natbib and the other not, or
both might use natbib but use different styles and so generate different
labels.
Well, I did not express myself correctly. This is about the scanning of
the bibtex _filenames_ not about the scanning of the bibtex file content.
So, a formally correct solution would somehow encode not only the Bibtex file
name in the cache but also how the file was used.
Maybe.
Abdel.
