>>>>> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> This is _much_ better. BTW did you notice Martin> InsetBranch::plaintext()? The infrastructure is there, waiting Martin> to be used... My problem was to know whether we should restrict ourselves to the first paragraph. Martin> Does anyone see a gotcha or want to test this still (generally Martin> a good idea), or can I commit this to 1.5? (a similar patch to Martin> toc.C in 1.4 would also be appropriate.) >> A patch similar to above would be OK for 1.4. Martin> Jean-Marc, could you do this, as it is near-trivial? I'm again Martin> having access problems (i.e., its near-complete absence) over Martin> the extended weekend :-( I'll have a look. JMarc
