Michael Gerz wrote: > Actually, I intended to switch to two complementing packages: > changes.sty and changebar.sty. The translation problem of changes.sty is > not really a problem, because we wouldn't use the corresponding feature > within LyX. Nevertheless, I contacted the author (no answer yet).
For me the translation problems are a sign that the package is not mature enough yet. This may be wrong or not, but this is the impression I get without further looking at the package. > So what you propose is actually this, right? > > 1. Use changebar.sty as long as dvips produces correct output > 2. Use some basic package (ulem or soul) rather than changes.sty Almost, but not exactly. Use whatever you like, as long as it produces a valid .dvi, and you are confident that the package interface will still work in 3 years or so. Georg
