Abdelrazak Younes schrieb:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 06:36:15PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
My point is that is not equivalent. A tree-like approach will
inevitably lead to cleaner and shorter code, I am 100% sure of that.
Besides, I still have difficulty to grasp the cursor slice concept.
Make a poll in the list and you will realise that close to nobody
really understand the cursor and cursor slice related code. For
example I still don't know how to select a text between two Cursors...
Asking might help.
I've done that, many times may I add. Even Michael has asked many
times and I believe he managed to find the solution by himself at the
end (which I don't remember).
I found a solution for my specific problem but I still don't understand
all the details - it just works.
The difficulties are partly caused by the many helper methods that
result in a high degree of indirection. It is very difficult to get to
the core. Less (similar) methods would be better.
Michael
