On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 12:55:58AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 07:14:38PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > > > >> Michael Gerz wrote: > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > >>>> Author: younes > >>>> Date: Sun Mar 25 18:13:14 2007 > >>>> New Revision: 17553 > >>>> > >>>> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/17553 > >>>> Log: > >>>> Third present for Bo: Add syntax highlighting to the LateX preamble. > >>>> TODO: extract the latexHighlighter class into its own .[Ch] files. > >>>> > >>> this is a very interesting kind of bug fix :-) > >> But it's very close to a bug fix. I am now automaically able to > >> understand a bit what this preamble is about ;-) > >> > >>> (We are in bug fixing mode, aren't we?) > >> Sure but tiny improvements like this one won't affect my bug fixing > >> abilities :-) > > > > Could this "feature" be made configurable? > > It could, just do it ;-) (look at the latexHighlighter class in > QViewSource.C).
Abdel, I have been flamed for changing the colour of the "Note" text, so you can't expect to not get complaints when you try to force something which should be agreed upon down someone's throat ;-) I really hate syntax highlighting. I can bear it in the view source but the preamble is something I work with heavily and I can't really stand it. > More seriously, maybe someone else has done something like this > already... maybe the Kile people? Perhaps that's why I don't use Kile? I think that you should have asked for opinions before doing the change. -- Enrico
