On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 08:55:28PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 03:54:17PM +0100, José Matos wrote: > | > On Monday 26 March 2007 3:43:42 pm Andre Poenitz wrote: > | > > Quick full build is btw what is needed for the rpmdist target > | > > | > I agree. > | > > | > > [If we stick to the "pristine sources" dogma...] > | > > | > How do you intend to build an rpm without a srpm? > | > | There is no need for an srpm when building an rpm. One can > | put arbitrary files in the %files section of the spec file, > | including binaries. > > But your want the srpm anyway...
Sure, and there's nothing wrong with that. It's just that the rpms not necessarily have to be build from the srpm as long as the result is the same. Even in C++ there is the "as-if" rule... Andre'
