>>>>> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Georg Baum wrote: >> Timothy Reaves wrote: >>> A lot of the responders are missing the point, and are holding to >>> their 'if I can figures it out, so should anyone else' mentality. >> I don't think that anybody has missed the point. For example, the >> suggestion to grey out the glossary entry if the package is not >> available makes sense. I don't remember anybody writing that it is >> not needed, and hopefully somebody (Abdel?) will implement that. Abdelrazak> I agree this is needed but, as I said, I don't know much Abdelrazak> this area and I don't want to spend my scarce time to Abdelrazak> investigate the issue. My next target is the instant Abdelrazak> preview bugs and I'd prefer to focus on that. Someone who Abdelrazak> knows the area (from our beloved LateX expert ;-)) should Abdelrazak> take the lead. Disabling the menu option when the package is not there is trivial, I'll have a look at it. What I do not know is what we should do when the glossary is already there in the document but not usable on the user's machine. JMarc
