On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 10:51:55AM +0200,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > I am thinking about something like s/QL//g and s/Q//g in
> > > > src/frontends/qt4.
> > And all .C to .cpp?
> Why? (I don't remember a consesus for that, but then again I'm lazy as I
> don't go and look...)
Consensus was along the lines of 'ok' -- 'I don't care'.
There was nobody insisting on .C as far as I rememeber.
Lars was because of his XML branch IIRC.
I don't remember, but Lars might have also been opposed for some other
reasion.
I reckon this is not a strong argument anyway because it is easy enough
to change the extension in there also. IMHO of course.
+1 for the Q* renaming
+1 for the .C -> .cpp renaming
Guess I'm in the 'don't care' camp. The only advantage I can think of for
.C is that you can then do e.g.
ls Dialog.[Ch]
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44 http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
