>>>>> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Stable branches are only doable when they are stable. Abdelrazak> Are you taking back the job? Whoever will maintain the so Abdelrazak> called "stable branch" will decide how to process. I leave Abdelrazak> that decision to you then. I just wanted to throw my 0.02 euros about what I learnt in these years maintaining the stable branch. Abdelrazak> That is the theory. In practice, if we don't set fixed Abdelrazak> dates for release, it simply can't happen quickly. But, if Abdelrazak> you force the development to be in the "stable branch" you Abdelrazak> _will_ have the focus you want. And you will have the bug Abdelrazak> fixing too. That would be nice too. Actually, at some time we were supposed to follow this "perpetually stable" model. It did not work out, but would be a valid goal. JMarc
