Georg Baum wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Then the is the problem of glossary versus nomenclature. At least my >> version of nomencl.sty writes a helpful "Nomenclature" heading in >> front of my glossary. This is stupid. > > Did you see Ugras' explanation for the choice of nomencl? IMHO the easiest > solution for this problem would be to not call this stuff "glossary" in > LyX. Then in a later version a real glossary support could be added. The > only problem with this is the docbook output. AFAIK docbook does not > support a nomenclature or list of symbols. Maybe one could use > variablelist, but it does not fit exactly. IMHO glossary should not be > used, because it should be reserved for the future glossary inset. What I forgot: Of course you can misuse the nomencl stuff for glossaries and redefine \nomname in the preamble, but I don't think that LyX should do that. Georg
