On 4/25/07, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>> "Ozgur" == Ozgur Ugras BARAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ozgur> Terminology fits good, but Jean-Marc has a point. The title of Ozgur> the glossary is Nomenclature by default and it will be wise to Ozgur> keep the same word for menu references for the sake of Ozgur> consistency. Yes, I think we should rename it to Nomenclature (please try to find all places where the term glossary is used; the only thing we should probably not change is the inset itself). Ozgur> Anybody else wishes switching for another glossary package? It Ozgur> will be easy for me to implement it (if you don't ask for Ozgur> gloss, since it requires bibtex instead of makeindex). No, we can add a separate glossary support later. JMarc This is in my TODO list. I have already finished the multiple indices and
thinking on extending it for multiple glossaries. But how will users react for this? Two glossary packages will create confusion. Probably we will have to remove nomencl to replace with new glossary package. If this will be the case it may be wise to change the glossary package now and add support for the multiple glossaries in the future. Of course We can discuss this later, if it will be no problem for replacing/ keeping nomencl support in the future. ugras
