On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 11:55:42AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Enrico Forestieri wrote: > >> Modified: > >> lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_4_X/src/frontends/qt2/QDelimiterDialog.C > >> URL: > >> http://www.lyx.org/trac/file/lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_4_X/src/frontends/qt2/QDelimiterDialog.C?rev=17924 > >> ============================================================================== > >> --- lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_4_X/src/frontends/qt2/QDelimiterDialog.C > >> (original) > >> +++ lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_4_X/src/frontends/qt2/QDelimiterDialog.C > >> Mon Apr 23 20:41:14 2007 > >> @@ -74,8 +74,6 @@ > >> { > >> if (str == "slash") > >> return "/"; > >> - if (str == "backslash") > >> - return big ? "\\\\" : "\\"; > >> if (str == "empty") > >> return "."; > >> if (!big || str == "(" || str == ")" || str == "[" || str == "]" > > > > I would suggest discussing changes on the list rather than on bugzilla. > > We did, but for 1.5 only.
;-) > > This is the exact patch I had proposed last year > > (see http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/57553/focus=58919) > > but was refused by Georg. > > We tried the \\ approach but it turned out that LateX did not like it. > Uwe surely knows why. TeX, does not define \\ as a macro for backslash (Knuth says that backslashes are uncommon and \\ is too easy to type to be used for this purpose) so in a LaTeX file \backslash is to be used. What I mean is that Georg stated that this worked at a point and thus this change could be hiding a bug. Maybe a discussion would have better clarified the matter. -- Enrico
