>>>>> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> What do you think? Andre> But I do not really want 'name_' in InstBase. _Every_ character Andre> in math will contain that... Andre> Of course we could implement name_ several times fuirther down Andre> in the hierarchy... Do we really need to _set_ the inset name? Couldn'it be just a virtual method returning the name? JMarc