Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Richard Heck wrote: >> I wonder whether I should just commit the patch as-is, thus fixing HTML >> output and View>HTML for 1.5.0, and do something about cleaning this >> code up more generally after 1.5.0 is out. My thought is just that >> changing how convert() works more extensively could lead to problems and >> would need testing, whereas I know that the current patch only changes >> the behavior of originaldir/usetempdir and so is safe. Thoughts? > > I think your approach is sound if you promise to do the proper cleanup > after 1.5.0 ;-) Yes, sir. I promise. ;-/ > I would really like to have a fully functional html export in 1.5.0. I > always have to export to LateX first and run htlatex on it. This is > very annoying. Very.
rh -- ================================================================== Richard G Heck, Jr Professor of Philosophy Brown University http://frege.brown.edu/heck/ ================================================================== Get my public key from http://sks.keyserver.penguin.de Hash: 0x1DE91F1E66FFBDEC Learn how to sign your email using Thunderbird and GnuPG at: http://dudu.dyn.2-h.org/nist/gpg-enigmail-howto
