Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Michael Gerz wrote: >> I wonder whether we should drop the dvipdfm path for 1.5.X. Is anybody >> actually using this (possibly outdated) tool? Offering tree ways to >> generate PDF may cause more confusion than it brings benefits. > > No. > dvipdfmx is neither useless nor outdated: > http://project.ktug.or.kr/dvipdfmx/
dvipdfm is useless ... there is also a xdvipdfmx Herbert
