Indeed, I am agree with Alfredo on this issue. Therefore I have attached another patch which uses string() for comparison. Use whichever you think is best.
+ string suffix(name,1);
+ string pars;
+ for(pariter = parlist.begin(); pariter != parlist.end();
pariter++) {
+ size_type par = (*pariter).find(suffix);
+ if(par!=string::npos) {
+ if (!pars.empty())
+ pars += ", ";
+ pars += (*pariter);
+ }
+ }
At least in this file, it usually uses
if (contains(*pariter, suffix))
Cheers,
Bo
