Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
Jean-Marc> Something like that. I tested briefly with 3 different
Jean-Marc> authors, and I think something is wrong (I think it was
Jean-Marc> already wrong before, actually). I do not see how current
Jean-Marc> author could always be index 0 (which is written in the
Jean-Marc> file) if the file is really edited by several authors.
I meant like _that_.
Ok, I tested the following:
New document with changes by "Michael Gerz":
\tracking_changes true
\output_changes false
\author "Michael Gerz" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Edit the same document without change tracking by "MG".
\tracking_changes false
\output_changes false
\author ""
\author "Michael Gerz" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enable change tracking, delete some text:
\tracking_changes true
\output_changes false
\author "MG" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\author "Michael Gerz" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Edit the same document by "Mike", add a par break:
\tracking_changes true
\output_changes false
\author "Mike" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\author "MG" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\author "Michael Gerz" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accept all changes by "Mike" and "MG":
\tracking_changes true
\output_changes false
\author ""
\author ""
\author "Michael Gerz" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All of this make perfectly sense to me. Although Jean-Marc has left us
with some FUD (but without a given proof), I would like to commit his
patch. Could someone please give another OK?
Thanks,
Michael
