On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 02:14:29PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 12:30:30PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > >> Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >> > I don't know, you're the autoconf expert here ;-) > >> > IMO, the most easy option is requiring automake 1.7 or later. > >> > >> Which would mean in turn autoconf 2.54. I am not sure if it can be a > >> problem for someone. What is debian-stable sing these days? > > > > I think they ship the whole spectrum and you select what to use > > through the alternatives method. Meaning that you could also pair > > incompatible versions of automake and autoconf... > > The default should be the last available versions, though. > > A few years ago, people using debian-stable were stuck with very old > development tools.
This doesn't seem to be the case anymore: http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=automake&searchon=names&subword=1&version=stable&release=all http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=autoconf&searchon=names&subword=1&version=stable&release=all -- Enrico
