Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > writes: > >> I take it you mean ++cur.top(). Would it help to call it >> CursorSlice::forwardPos ? > > Definitely. ++ does not tell whether you increase the index, the pit > or the pos. > >> If fact it is rather weird, and the "proof" is that we don't need this >> feature at all in the code. Without that "feature" (and no caller code >> uses it currently), the thing only moves on a flat cursorslice, I find >> counterintuitive to have it on DocIterator. > > Agreed. Go ahead with CursorSlice::forwardPos.
Thanks, commited. A/
