On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 08:22:50PM +0200, Asger Ottar Alstrup wrote: > John Levon wrote: > >On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 08:10:10PM +0200, Asger Ottar Alstrup wrote: > > > >>It seems people have the priorities wrong. I think you need to rank > >>efforts based on how much it brings thing forward per time unit, because > >>LyX is chronically resource starved. > > > >Which is why it's a huge problem when uncontrolled development is > >allowed (see pretty much ever major LyX release, ever, but *especially* > >the huge quagmire 1.4cvs got itself into). > > As an exercise for the reader - maybe your skill level will improve - go > back and read what I wrote, and tell me what should have been done > differently in the 1.4.x cycle.
I am not John, but my answer to the question is that the freeze should have been revoked when it turned out that (almost) nobody actually worked on fixing the blockers instead of running into a deadlock. Andre'
