Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Are you sure of that? It seems to me that Word and OpenOffice adds > "ignored words" into a list and not to the word font definitions or > character attributes itself.
I was actually thinking about setting an area of text as "do not spellcheck". Like what happens when setting language to [none] in openoffice. This may be useful for largeish areas of text (If I add a latin citation just to look cool, I do not want to install a latin dictionary, because I am not _that_ cool). > 1) you want to ignore some words: the chance are very high that you > want do that in _any_ document. So this information has nothing to do > in the document. The ignored word should be put on a list of ignored > items. Then, it is as easy to just add these words to your personal > dictionary. This should already work (am I wrong?) What is missing is the feature to ignore words for _this_ document (for example, some variable names that you would not like to put in your personal dictionary). Also, this makes sure that, when you send to document to someone, this someone sees the same result. > 3) you want to avoid spellchecking of a formatted text (with multiple > layouts). An InsetCitation is the solution. InsetCitation would derive > from InsetCollapsable and it's only purpose is to disable > spellchecking. Why InsetCitation? I think these 4 mechanisms are too much. We cannot add 4 different concepts just for spell checking. Anyway, the first priority would be to overhaul the spellchecker interface. JMarc
