On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 09:17:01PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 04:33:19PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > > > > > >I just build release-static and release-dynamic with current svn 'pure > > >autoconf'. debug-static is in the pipe. > > > > > >I'd like to hear of any problems people experience (and, of course any > > >idea on with the --with-qmake build crahes when constructin a > > >boost::signal) > > > > I might be able to set up a temporary system on a linux server that builds > > with different options this weekend. That might make it easier to check > > that it builds without warnings/errors? You'll have to tell me what > > combinations of options I should test though. > > a) --with-debug vs --without-debug > b) <nothing> vs --disable-dynamic --enable-static > c) in-tree vs out-of-tree > > Mac might be interesting, Jean-Marc mentioned installation into the > wrong place there. > > > Do you know if there's still a difference with using a separate build > > directory? (In other words, is there a point to testing with and without a > > separate build directory). > > Good question. Just started my first in-tree-build.
Went well, actually. 'make distclean' leaves a lot of dirt afterwards, though, _and_ removes some headers in frontends/qt4 that it isn't supposed to remove. But I have a suspicion that this might have been like that for a while... Andre'
