On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 12:54:56PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > > > Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > >> This the same concept as the previous post for CursorSlices. > > > > I personally agree with the two patches. > > Thanks! I'll apply on monday if there are no objections. > > btw, we should implement good const semantics for CursorSlice, DocIterator > and Cursor, it's really missing.
Do we really need it? It probably means some code duplication, and so far the old 'fake' constness you just remove sort-of-worked. Andre' >
