On Thursday 23 August 2007 19:30:19 Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 01:11:52PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > > > That alternative would of course not have guaranteed that 1.5.0 would be > > released with qt3. Maybe it would indeed have been too much work to keep > > it up to date, and it would have been abandoned, but this would then have > > been the decision of _those who where doing the work_. > > You miss the point that we do not have unlimited resources.
Honestly I am not sure that would have so worse. And Georg agreed that qt3 was only for 1.5.x. > If qt3 lived on for a while and had been killed later even more > resources would have gone to the kitchen sink. > > > What happened instead is that _you_ dictated that those should stop or > > jump through some extra hoops. > > And you haven't been in Greve to prevent it... Greve has not our best showcase. Clearly this was a consequence of 1.4 but I think that we have learned the lesson and I hope the best for lyx 2.0 (oops I mean 1.6). > Andre' -- José Abílio
