On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 10:24:20 +0200 Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 11:33:52PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > >> Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > >> > >> >> I don't have time to act on this until saturday so feel free to change > >> >> that if you want. > >> > > >> > I don't have time either unfortunately. I'll be a rather busy (read > >> > traveling) in the next 30 days or so... IMHO, (if you agree) we should > >> > just revert the full patch series if possible. > >> > >> That is btw: > >> > >> 20068 > >> 20070 > >> 20071 > >> 20079 > >> 20080 > >> 20083 > >> 20100 > >> 20101 > >> 20103 > >> > >> Patch attached. I don't know if I'm missing anything. There are maybe > >> related changes (like the removal of textmetrics in InsetText) that > >> should be redone. > >> > >> A/ > > > > Please test this for all types of insets including charstyles > > (Conglomerate). I ended up doing some cleanup there after Abdel's work. > > It was something that didn't work before or just adjustment to Abdel's > change? Which changeset? Just adjustment... and I collided with Abdel. That's why two changesets, 20102 and 20103. > > Would this be the point to switch the standard charstyles (noun, emph, > > code, strong) on by default for standard documentclasses? Then it won't > > be so easily overlooked in future work. > > We should make a compact test document with all possible features (including > RTL etc), and possible including a screen snapshot of how should it look > and a tex export. Then before commiting disrupting changes one could just > test on it and compare results. Yes, we should. - Martin
