On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 07:40:35PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > On 9/18/07, Richard Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Bo Peng wrote: > > >> Well, thanks to Richard we have the possibility to build custom flex > > >> insets for this now, right? Look Ma, no C++! > > >> > > >> All that's left then is adding the lyx2lyx code to convert the old > > >> insets to this. > > >> > > >> Any takers? > > >> > > > Not me. I do not know what is a flex inset. > > > > > Well, I appreciate the sentiment. I had the idea, but Martin did all the > > coding, so it's not quite thanks to me. That means the bugs are his. ;-) > > > > In any event, flex insets are what used to be charstyles, only now it's > > possible to make them collapsable as well as inline. So you can do > > something like this: > > InsetLayout Custom:Label > > LyXType custom > > LatexName label > > LatexType command > > Decoration classic > > LabelString Label > > End > > And there's the inset, with no C++ required. Color, etc, can be set as > > usual. > > This "flex" name is sort of uninformative. What about calling them > "soft" insets (as in soft-coded vs. hard-coded)?
It's as uninformative. Andre'
