[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jürgen Spitzmüller) writes: >> Actually, it could be renamed to something like >> break-paragraph-special, or an 'inverse' option could be added to >> break-paragraph. > > Yes, the current name is certainly misleading. > I would prefer to merge the two lfuns and add an option (I don't > like "inverse". How about "parentlayout"?).
parentlayout is definitely wrong, I really want to convey the idea 'do it, but differently as you would do by default'. Ideas include: break-paragraph special break-paragraph inverse break-paragraph alt break-paragraph 1 So, what name shall I give to this thing? JMarc
