On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 06:36:16PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> >> Could give a more precise scenario where this happens?
> >
> > Would be irrelevant. There is no reason that the status update is
> > triggered _only_ by a cursor move.
> 
> It is not a cursor move, it is any action going through dispatch.
> 
> Then the update mechanism is free to schedule more updates.

Update request arriving within a certain interval (say 30-50ms or so)
can be merged into one. This won't be noticable.

Andre'

Reply via email to