Richard Heck wrote:

> Yes, "none" would work fine if we had such a combo box (which we don't
> yet). But I'd also like to have "change to ..." rather than having to
> dissolve and re-apply. This is harder to do with a combo box, since you
> may haven't wanted to insert a new inset within the existing one, i.e.:
> <em>this is <strong>strong</strong></em>
> which is reasonable.

I see. However, we might think about a panel solution (as in OOs, Word 2003
and InDesign), where you could have a button "change to". At least the
former two have a combox _and_ a panel (for the more complex tasks), so
it's not necessarily redundant to have both.

Jürgen

Reply via email to