Richard Heck wrote: > Yes, "none" would work fine if we had such a combo box (which we don't > yet). But I'd also like to have "change to ..." rather than having to > dissolve and re-apply. This is harder to do with a combo box, since you > may haven't wanted to insert a new inset within the existing one, i.e.: > <em>this is <strong>strong</strong></em> > which is reasonable.
I see. However, we might think about a panel solution (as in OOs, Word 2003 and InDesign), where you could have a button "change to". At least the former two have a combox _and_ a panel (for the more complex tasks), so it's not necessarily redundant to have both. Jürgen