On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 06:12:30PM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote: > Enrico Forestieri wrote: > >On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 11:46:11AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > >>On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 12:33:27PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > >>>On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 06:22:09AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > >>>>On Sat, Oct 20, 2007 at 11:08:09PM -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>Author: broider > >>>>>Date: Sun Oct 21 01:08:02 2007 > >>>>>New Revision: 21092 > >>>>> > >>>>>URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/21092 > >>>>>Log: > >>>>>Search for toolbar images in the filesystem and afterwards in the > >>>>>resource. > >>>>Now I really wonder what is the benefit of having resources compiled > >>>>in, given that the images are still searched on disk. Someone could > >>>>explain that? My impression is that now we have a 1Mb fatter executable > >>>>and no real benefit... > >>>My impression is that the images are searched for, but only > >>>those are loaded from the disk that are found there. I suppose > >>>the latter is more work than a directory scan. > >>My impression is that people should check _their_ numbers first and > >>complain then. Preferably with a description that's suitable to > >>reproduce those numbers. > > > >$ ls -l src/lyx*.exe > >-rwxr-xr-x 1 root 21148998 Oct 21 01:22 src/lyx.exe* > >-rwxr-xr-x 1 root 19975298 Sep 12 00:32 src/lyx-old.exe* > > > > Isn't the only relevant number the startup time? > > Somewhere the pngs must come from.
As I said, my numbers were ~0.4s saving on a total startup time of ~7s on a cold system. Andre'
