On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 10:06:36PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 09:41:33PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > > Because it voids 30% of the effect of having strfwd.h at all and it is > > > not needed here and therefore probably on ~100% of the Linux systems out > > > there. > > > > Even if that doesn't matter for you, there are other systems than > > Linux out there and doing things the standard way usually helps. > > The Standard says how basic_istream<> etc should be defined. It does not > mandate that #include <iosfwd> is the only way to get it. Doing it 'by > hand' is as legal even if less convienient than the #include.
Then do it, by all means. I promise that I will not do any stilistic observations and will not require that you post your changes to the list and wait some hours before committing. -- Enrico
