Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
using 'namespace lyx::support' instead of the tens of 'using
support::xxx'. I'll do that now.
This is getting ridiculous. We are adding our own namespace,
I was not there when the support namespace was added but I guess that
the rationale was that an external project project could use the support
library independantly from lyx source code. I think this is a myth, it
will never happen.
and then
we decide to ignore it.
The two notion are pretty orthogonal. There are absolutely no difference
code wise. FWIW, I would be OK if we remove all nested namespace and
stay with one unique flat namespace: lyx.
Abdel.
