On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 03:00:35PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I don't want to use the same LDFLAGS used to build Qt, for example, as > > in this case I would lose the debug info, whether or not I want it. > > OK, so we should ignore Qt LDFLAGS.
Possibly. I'll let you decide what is better as I can find easy workarounds. > > Then, I have to point configure to the build dir, but should also > > have installed Qt, as the spotted directories are the installation > > ones. Needless to say that I find all of this very inconvenient. > > Moreover, I don't think that this is cygwin specific. > > But if you point it to the installation dir, does it work? Yes, as I wrote. The point is that the configuration depends on the existence of the "default" symlink and, depending on packaging, it may be present or not. Anyway, given that Qt4 may also exist in parallel to Qt3, it is wise to always set QMAKESPEC (or pass the -spec option to qmake). -- Enrico
