Richard Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Having seen your message, I decide not to answer it because your 'this >> is not a problem' attitude is hard to beat. Yet, I do not see a >> practical implementation for this and will not be able to adapt my >> implementation to it. If JMarc and you feel strongly that this should >> be the way to go, I will revert my patches and let you implement >> yours. >> >> Jose, maybe this should be your call. >> >> > It'd be nice to hear from other developers on this. If you and I are > the only ones who care, then, well....
I did not see Richard's messages as particularly closed to discussion. This subject is difficult to get right anyway, and it is not surprising that we have difficulties to find a common ground. I do not have myself a solution that satisfies me at 100%. JMarc
