Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <lasgout...@lyx.org> writes:
| Pavel Sanda <sa...@lyx.org> writes:
>
>> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>>> As for refering to a svn revision instead of a git branch, this is a
>>> different mental model indeed, but not not a loss of function IMHO.
>>
>> to me this depends on what kind of development model you use and given
>> the number of lyx developers and the way we proceed i think the centralized
>> way is the better one.
>
| For users that (try to) help us find bugs (and we need these people),
| saying "it did work at r1234" is easier that giving a hash (isn't this
| how a git state is defined? here I show my ignorance about it).
I do not quite get that... who is it easer to say r1234 instead of
23ae45?
| To make things clearer, there is some merit to the increasingness of the
| svn revision numbers (in two different branches at a time). From what I
| understand about git, it is lost in the new world.
well... otoh one change on the trunk will be named/numbered the same way
on branch... that is not the case with subversion. (even if you take
merge tracking into account)
--
Lgb
