Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <lasgout...@lyx.org> writes: | Pavel Sanda <sa...@lyx.org> writes: > >> Abdelrazak Younes wrote: >>> As for refering to a svn revision instead of a git branch, this is a >>> different mental model indeed, but not not a loss of function IMHO. >> >> to me this depends on what kind of development model you use and given >> the number of lyx developers and the way we proceed i think the centralized >> way is the better one. > | For users that (try to) help us find bugs (and we need these people), | saying "it did work at r1234" is easier that giving a hash (isn't this | how a git state is defined? here I show my ignorance about it).
I do not quite get that... who is it easer to say r1234 instead of 23ae45? | To make things clearer, there is some merit to the increasingness of the | svn revision numbers (in two different branches at a time). From what I | understand about git, it is lost in the new world. well... otoh one change on the trunk will be named/numbered the same way on branch... that is not the case with subversion. (even if you take merge tracking into account) -- Lgb