rgheck wrote: >>> By the way, can you remember what problem Bennet had which made you >>> adding the lhs.refresh() and rhs.refresh() lines to >>> FileName::operator==(). This solution looks a bit like "Abdel's hammer". >>> >>> >> Not right now, no, though it's probably on the list somewhere. But I >> think the problem was that, when caching is enabled, the file could >> have moved, been deleted, etc, and you'll miss it without a refresh. >> >http://marc.info/?l=lyx-devel&m=121734075326705&w=2 > >rh >
The thread starts with a problem that would be the consequence of r25960. I don't see why refreshing is a solution for a problem that could have been introduces in r25960. The thread neither gives an answer why and whether the changes are correct. More question marks thus.. Vincent
