"Lars Gullik Bjønnes" wrote:
>
> "Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | "Lars Gullik Bjønnes" wrote:
> | >
> | > "Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> |
> | > | I don't know where I got the idea that cua.bind should include
> | > | menus.bind, but I think it always has. It also includes math.bind and
> | > | hollywood.bind. Should I remove all of those?
> | >
> | > No, but when preferences is in use lyxrc is ignored. So if you have
> | > menus.bind in preferences you will only get the bindings defined
> | > there.
> | >
> | > Lgb
> | No bind files were defined in preferences, but when I changed lyxrc, the
> | stuff that did come up in preferences changed with it, so I don't think
> | it is totally ignored. I don't have a clue as to why preferences listed
> | menus.bind as the bind file, but that is probably why I lost my Ctrl key
> | functions.
> | Garst
>
> // If there is a preferences file we read that instead
> // of the old lyxrc file.
> if (!ReadRcFile("preferences"))
> ReadRcFile("lyxrc");
>
> lyxrc is not supposed to be read if a read of preferences is
> successful.
>
> Lgb
Yes, but if lyxrc is not there to start with preferences cannot be
saved, so there will not be a preferences. Once preferences gets saved
then the lyxrc is not read anymore, but preferences got the wrong bind
file.
Garst
