Rex Dieter wrote: > I'd continue to argue that should not be a prerequisite, as it is preferable > (for a vast majority of users) to lyx's current handling of this. A > further testiment is how many downstreams are already patching-in xdg-utils > support.
are the xdg devs open to natively assimilate some basic mime table? the rescue call of firefox if no of the frontends is found is awful and doesn't even work for eg dvi. for lyx this table needs to contain at least raster image extensions, pdf, ps, dvi, html. pavel
